Agree we should integrate a stETH -> USDC token buyer. But unstaking some in the meantime makes sense.
+1
> We should add a new TokenBuyer for stETH -> USDC before the next time we run out of ETH.
>
> Would work for any ERC-20, so it would be easy to deploy for other assets in the future.
>
> For lumped payments, governance clients should start to suggest stETH instead of ETH.
>
> Ideally, the DAO holds yield-bearing assets for as long as possible.
>
> +1
>
> > The problem is that proposals asking for USDC will stop getting funded because the TokenBuyer/Payer flow doesn't work with stETH.
> >
> > +1
> >
> > > Why not just use stETH instead of ETH as payment so the treasury can continue to earn yield on holdings?