Will has summed this up already.
Artists need a choice, not forced into an minting experiment by anons permissionlessly minting pointers to their tracks.
This is also dubious ground for record labels to act against and by extension DAO supporting such experiment.
Check Song.tech (Similar experiment on base for traction reference).
- Supriyo (Voting AGAINST on behalf of Bonfire)
+1
> I love the energy here and am very supportive of efforts to find alternative, more sustainable compensation models for artists. I do think that when one of crypto’s biggest narratives is “We make more money for artists”, a narrative of “Nouns funds piracy” is too high a risk of being interpreted in bad faith. I’ve personally seen even the most benign of crypto efforts (like buying books) be turned into attack lines outside the industry.
>
> (That being said, the narrative is clever marketing for how provocative it is, but funding it is narratively charged too)
